Thames Anglers' Conservancy Members Forum
TAC Members-Only Forum
If you have arrived here and not yet signed up as a member, then please first join at using your real name.

Forum Membership is with Real Names only.
Please create a Username that is your First Name and Surname eg. "Joe Bloggs"
(This will save our Admin team the need to contact you about changing it)

Thames Anglers' Conservancy Members Forum
HomeHome  TAC Home PageTAC Home Page  SearchSearch  FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister  Log in  

Display results as :
Rechercher Advanced Search
Latest topics
» *Thames Tunnel (Tideway Tunnel)*
Wed Jul 18, 2018 9:56 am by John LeSurf

» new hotel at hampton court means loss of fishing
Wed Jul 04, 2018 1:26 pm by Ed Randall

» Eel Trap Clean Up/ training 5th May 2018 10am
Sat Jun 09, 2018 3:46 pm by Ed Randall

» FORCE clean-up in Donkey Wood ~ Sun 13th May 2018
Thu May 17, 2018 10:16 am by JeffHowe

Thu Apr 05, 2018 2:23 pm by John LeSurf

» penton hook tidy up.
Wed Mar 07, 2018 7:05 am by John LeSurf

» Riverfly & Clean-up Donkey Woods Saturday 18th Nov 2017
Sat Dec 23, 2017 1:02 pm by Ed Randall

» Biggest fish of all book
Fri Dec 22, 2017 5:43 pm by Adrian Hoare

» Wandle Trust - eel pass installation - call for volunteers
Thu Dec 07, 2017 8:53 am by Ed Randall

» Outfall Safari across London - call for Volunteers!
Thu Dec 07, 2017 8:47 am by Ed Randall

» Fishing the Thames at Medley
Thu Nov 02, 2017 2:33 pm by Trevor Rowe

» Thames Semi-Tidal Draw Off 2017
Fri Oct 20, 2017 9:08 pm by Ed Randall

» Eel Trap Results 2017
Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:07 pm by patrick barker

» Fish-swallowing Angler "lucky to be alive"
Sat Oct 14, 2017 8:01 am by Ed Randall

» River Mole polluted at Horley
Fri Oct 13, 2017 8:52 am by Ed Randall

» Petition to stop the export of elvers
Thu Sep 21, 2017 2:16 pm by Ed Randall

» Riverfly Training ~ Hogsmill ~ 30th Sept 2017
Sat Sep 16, 2017 6:56 am by Ed Randall

» Monster fatberg in Whitechapel
Tue Sep 12, 2017 1:40 pm by Ed Randall

» Radio 4 ~ Macquarie: The Tale of the River Bank
Tue Sep 12, 2017 12:28 pm by Ed Randall

» Thames TideFest 10th September 2017
Tue Sep 12, 2017 9:00 am by John LeSurf

» Invitation to the 2017 Eel Forum ~ 17th October
Sat Sep 09, 2017 8:32 am by Ed Randall

» Do you recognise any of these men?
Sat Aug 19, 2017 8:44 pm by Ed Randall

» Roads closed everywhere ~ July 29th/30th ~ bike race
Wed Jul 26, 2017 9:17 am by Ed Randall

» Better access to free Thames fishing in Reading
Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:08 am by Ed Randall

» Eel screens on Water Works intakes
Tue May 23, 2017 10:26 pm by Julian Jones

» River Thames Conditions - Quick Dial Numbers
Sun May 21, 2017 10:00 am by Ed Randall

» Ap[ril showers? If only! Drought beckons...
Thu May 04, 2017 6:56 pm by Ed Randall

» Abbey river this Saturday (12/5/2012)
Thu Apr 27, 2017 4:41 pm by Ed Randall

» Molesey Eel Monitoring Training ~ 29th April 2017
Mon Apr 24, 2017 11:12 am by David Harvey

» Thames Water fined a record £20m for River Thames pollution
Fri Mar 24, 2017 1:54 pm by Stephen Bond

Angling Data View
River Levels
UK Map

Thames Tides

Share | 

 Thames Water ordered to pay more than £61,000 after serious sewage spill

Go down 
David Harvey


Male Posts : 5381
Join date : 2010-01-21
Age : 103
Location : Surrey,

PostSubject: Thames Water ordered to pay more than £61,000 after serious sewage spill    Thu Dec 08, 2011 6:24 pm


Britain’s largest water company has been ordered to pay £61,049 after devastating the aquatic life in two rural brooks in Hampshire and Berkshire killing between 7,500 and 22,000 fish.

Thames Water Utilities Limited pleaded guilty at an earlier hearing to causing sewage sludge to enter the Silchester Brook (Hampshire) and Foudry Brook (Berkshire) in July 2010 and asked for a breach of its condition to discharge treated effluent to be taken into consideration.

Thames Water were fined £29,985, ordered to pay the Environment Agency’s costs of £31,049 and a £15 victim surcharge, a total of 61,049.

On 21 July 2010 the Environment Agency’s hotline received numerous calls from local residents about a strong smell of sewage and grey-coloured water in the Silchester Brook. Environment officers attended the scene and were greeted with a strong stench of sewage and hundreds of dead or dying fish.

Winchester Crown Court heard that Environment Agency officers worked tirelessly over five days in July last year to deal with the devastating effect the sewage had on the watercourse. It is estimated that between 7,500 and 22,000 high quality fish were killed including chub, brown trout, perch, pike, roach, tench, bullhead and loach, with many of the larger specimens being irreplaceable.

Officers dosed the river with hydrogen peroxide and deployed aeration equipment to maintain oxygen levels but the sewage continued to spread, affecting the total length of Silchester and Foudry brooks through Stratfield, Mortimer, Grazely, Three Mile Cross and Green Park in Reading.

Residents reported feeling depressed and upset at the state of the brook following the incident as the brooks are used widely by the local community for agriculture and recreation. Over the course of the incident 17 members of the public raised concern about the colour and smell of the brook, and the large number of dead or dying fish within it. A local farmer rescued around 100 fish including chub, brown trout, perch and minnows in a makeshift aquarium on his property.

The court heard that Thames Water operates Silchester Sewage Treatment Works in Hampshire. In May 2010 two storage tanks used to store sewage sludge failed. Two redundant storm tanks were used to store sewage sludge – these were isolated from the sewage treatment process to prevent stored sewage sludge being pumped back into the works. However, on the morning of 20 July 2010 the two storm tanks were full and needed to be emptied.

In an interview under caution, Thames Water admitted that instead of waiting for a tanker already scheduled to remove the sludge, a Thames Water employee manually opened the valves on the storm tanks and pumped the entire quantity of stored sewage sludge to the inlet of the works. The highly concentrated material completely overwhelmed the system and a thick, sludgy effluent was discharged into the brook.

Thames Water stopped discharging from the sewage treatment works and were able to remove some of the pollution from the watercourse with tankers. The company also imported clean effluent from Basingstoke sewage treatment works to dilute the pollution in the watercourse, but the impact of the incident was already catastrophic.

Claire Bale, lead investigating officer for the Environment Agency, said: “We are pleased that the court has recognised the gravity of this incident and hope that this fine will act as an incentive to other operators to ensure they have appropriate procedures in place to better protect their local environment and community.

“We take these types of incidents very seriously and will do everything within our powers to safeguard the environment and people affected, and that includes bringing those who harm the environment to justice.

“We would like to thank those members of the public who reported the pollution to our incident hotline as they enabled us to trace the extent of the brook affected early on, allowing us to prevent the situation from being even worse. We are also grateful to the landowners that assisted us during this incident by granting access to their land and for offers of help.”

In sentencing Thames Water the court took into account the company’s early guilty plea and the discount for the early plea reduced the fine from £50,000. Judge Dixon also took into consideration that the company responded quickly as soon as it grasped the seriousness of the unforeseeable incident, which was as a result of actions of an unidentified employee.
Back to top Go down
Robin Vernon

Male Posts : 174
Join date : 2010-01-23
Location : Twickenham

PostSubject: Re: Thames Water ordered to pay more than £61,000 after serious sewage spill    Thu Dec 08, 2011 7:11 pm

Pathetic fine, creates no incentive whatsoever for TW to stop polluting.
Release into river = cheapest option = behaviour will continue.
Needs a proper regulator with real teeth to dish out proper fines.
Back to top Go down
Steve Appleford

Male Posts : 1106
Join date : 2010-01-28
Age : 54
Location : Newbury Berkshire

PostSubject: Re: Thames Water ordered to pay more than £61,000 after serious sewage spill    Thu Dec 08, 2011 7:50 pm

Unidentified employee it was casper the Ghost then Mad .
The foundry brook runs into the kennet where all the floating pennywort is that eacaped from the lake in Green park.....would be nice if the sewage sludge would kill that off as well .
As Robin said the fines are a joke of the worst kind.
Back to top Go down
James Annear

Male Posts : 670
Join date : 2011-01-02
Age : 60
Location : hammersmith

PostSubject: Thames Water ordered to pay more than £61,000 after serious sewage spill   Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:28 pm

Especially after they have reported first half year profits of £146million
Back to top Go down
Ed Randall


Male Posts : 3240
Join date : 2010-11-19
Age : 52
Location : Twickenham

PostSubject: Re: Thames Water ordered to pay more than £61,000 after serious sewage spill    Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:24 pm

My first thought, £61,000 is that all?
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content

PostSubject: Re: Thames Water ordered to pay more than £61,000 after serious sewage spill    

Back to top Go down
Thames Water ordered to pay more than £61,000 after serious sewage spill
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
» Four Thames boaters ordered to pay over £4k for navigating around fees
» Thames Water fined a record £20m for River Thames pollution
» Thames Water Admits polluting the River Ash on 8th August
» Kingsbury Water Park
» Water Tanks

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Thames Anglers' Conservancy Members Forum :: Open Section :: News Board :: Environment Agency-
Jump to: