Latest topics | » Thames Water live discharge mapSat Jan 21, 2023 6:32 pm by Ed Randall» Feargal Sharkey accuses Thames Water of sewage 'dumping'Fri Sep 04, 2020 4:24 pm by Ed Randall» COVID-19 - Get Fishing AgainSun Jun 07, 2020 1:04 pm by Julian Jones» Eel Trap Molesey - 2019Tue May 05, 2020 12:29 pm by Glyn Jones» GAS STOVESWed Apr 15, 2020 7:13 am by Keith Collett» Man missing in Thames at SheppertonTue Jan 21, 2020 3:27 pm by Ed Randall» Semi-Tidal Draw off 2019Mon Oct 28, 2019 9:55 pm by Ed Randall» Citizen Science forum at ZSL ~ 29th October 2019Sat Sep 28, 2019 4:19 pm by Ed Randall» Citizen Crane Forum ~ 16th and 29th October 2019Sat Sep 28, 2019 4:16 pm by Ed Randall» Tidefest match result 2019Tue Sep 10, 2019 8:50 am by Ed Randall» Closed season retained following public consultationThu Aug 22, 2019 12:20 pm by Ed Randall» Houseboat destroyed by fire in HamptonMon Aug 12, 2019 9:30 am by Ed Randall» Local tackle shopsFri Jul 05, 2019 1:16 pm by Trevor Rowe» New Season, New Licence...Fri Jun 14, 2019 12:24 am by Julian Jones» FORCE Clean-Up in Donkey Wood ~ Sun 14th April 2019Sun Apr 21, 2019 8:19 am by Ed Randall» The Big one - Farnborough 23rd-24th March 2019Sun Feb 10, 2019 11:30 am by Keith Collett» Thames So Full Of Cocaine It’s Pranging Out London’s EelsTue Jan 22, 2019 9:27 am by Trevor Rowe» "Citizen Crane" project - sampling datesThu Jan 10, 2019 8:51 am by Ed Randall» New Members: Real Names pleaseThu Jan 10, 2019 8:36 am by Ed Randall» Semi-Tidal draw-off 2018Sat Oct 27, 2018 5:44 pm by Ed Randall» Thames Water Blitz - 19th/20th October 2018Tue Oct 02, 2018 7:21 pm by Ed Randall» Citizen Crane Forum ~ 26th October 2018Sat Aug 25, 2018 7:41 pm by Ed Randall» Invitation to the 2018 Eel forum ~ 15th OctoberSat Aug 25, 2018 7:38 pm by Ed Randall» Mystery of dead eels found in riversSat Aug 25, 2018 6:43 pm by Ed Randall» Eel Trap Clean Up/ training 5th May 2018 10amSat Aug 25, 2018 6:40 pm by Ed Randall» A new address for 2017 ~ forum.rivertac.orgSun Aug 19, 2018 12:48 pm by Admin» Hampton Riviera removedThu Aug 16, 2018 10:41 pm by Ed Randall» Roads closed everywhere ~ July 29th/30th ~ bike raceMon Aug 06, 2018 10:14 am by John LeSurf» *Thames Tunnel (Tideway Tunnel)*Wed Jul 18, 2018 9:56 am by John LeSurf» new hotel at hampton court means loss of fishingWed Jul 04, 2018 1:26 pm by Ed Randall |
| | Thames Water ordered to pay more than £61,000 after serious sewage spill | |
| | Author | Message |
---|
David Harvey
Posts : 5381 Join date : 2010-01-21 Age : 109 Location : Surrey,
| Subject: Thames Water ordered to pay more than £61,000 after serious sewage spill Thu Dec 08, 2011 6:24 pm | |
| 08-Dec-2011
Britain’s largest water company has been ordered to pay £61,049 after devastating the aquatic life in two rural brooks in Hampshire and Berkshire killing between 7,500 and 22,000 fish.
Thames Water Utilities Limited pleaded guilty at an earlier hearing to causing sewage sludge to enter the Silchester Brook (Hampshire) and Foudry Brook (Berkshire) in July 2010 and asked for a breach of its condition to discharge treated effluent to be taken into consideration.
Thames Water were fined £29,985, ordered to pay the Environment Agency’s costs of £31,049 and a £15 victim surcharge, a total of 61,049.
On 21 July 2010 the Environment Agency’s hotline received numerous calls from local residents about a strong smell of sewage and grey-coloured water in the Silchester Brook. Environment officers attended the scene and were greeted with a strong stench of sewage and hundreds of dead or dying fish.
Winchester Crown Court heard that Environment Agency officers worked tirelessly over five days in July last year to deal with the devastating effect the sewage had on the watercourse. It is estimated that between 7,500 and 22,000 high quality fish were killed including chub, brown trout, perch, pike, roach, tench, bullhead and loach, with many of the larger specimens being irreplaceable.
Officers dosed the river with hydrogen peroxide and deployed aeration equipment to maintain oxygen levels but the sewage continued to spread, affecting the total length of Silchester and Foudry brooks through Stratfield, Mortimer, Grazely, Three Mile Cross and Green Park in Reading.
Residents reported feeling depressed and upset at the state of the brook following the incident as the brooks are used widely by the local community for agriculture and recreation. Over the course of the incident 17 members of the public raised concern about the colour and smell of the brook, and the large number of dead or dying fish within it. A local farmer rescued around 100 fish including chub, brown trout, perch and minnows in a makeshift aquarium on his property.
The court heard that Thames Water operates Silchester Sewage Treatment Works in Hampshire. In May 2010 two storage tanks used to store sewage sludge failed. Two redundant storm tanks were used to store sewage sludge – these were isolated from the sewage treatment process to prevent stored sewage sludge being pumped back into the works. However, on the morning of 20 July 2010 the two storm tanks were full and needed to be emptied.
In an interview under caution, Thames Water admitted that instead of waiting for a tanker already scheduled to remove the sludge, a Thames Water employee manually opened the valves on the storm tanks and pumped the entire quantity of stored sewage sludge to the inlet of the works. The highly concentrated material completely overwhelmed the system and a thick, sludgy effluent was discharged into the brook.
Thames Water stopped discharging from the sewage treatment works and were able to remove some of the pollution from the watercourse with tankers. The company also imported clean effluent from Basingstoke sewage treatment works to dilute the pollution in the watercourse, but the impact of the incident was already catastrophic.
Claire Bale, lead investigating officer for the Environment Agency, said: “We are pleased that the court has recognised the gravity of this incident and hope that this fine will act as an incentive to other operators to ensure they have appropriate procedures in place to better protect their local environment and community. “We take these types of incidents very seriously and will do everything within our powers to safeguard the environment and people affected, and that includes bringing those who harm the environment to justice.
“We would like to thank those members of the public who reported the pollution to our incident hotline as they enabled us to trace the extent of the brook affected early on, allowing us to prevent the situation from being even worse. We are also grateful to the landowners that assisted us during this incident by granting access to their land and for offers of help.”
In sentencing Thames Water the court took into account the company’s early guilty plea and the discount for the early plea reduced the fine from £50,000. Judge Dixon also took into consideration that the company responded quickly as soon as it grasped the seriousness of the unforeseeable incident, which was as a result of actions of an unidentified employee.
| |
| | | Robin Vernon
Posts : 174 Join date : 2010-01-23 Location : Twickenham
| Subject: Re: Thames Water ordered to pay more than £61,000 after serious sewage spill Thu Dec 08, 2011 7:11 pm | |
| Pathetic fine, creates no incentive whatsoever for TW to stop polluting. Release into river = cheapest option = behaviour will continue. Needs a proper regulator with real teeth to dish out proper fines. | |
| | | Steve Appleford
Posts : 1106 Join date : 2010-01-28 Age : 60 Location : Newbury Berkshire
| Subject: Re: Thames Water ordered to pay more than £61,000 after serious sewage spill Thu Dec 08, 2011 7:50 pm | |
| Unidentified employee ..so it was casper the Ghost then . The foundry brook runs into the kennet where all the floating pennywort is that eacaped from the lake in Green park.....would be nice if the sewage sludge would kill that off as well . As Robin said the fines are a joke of the worst kind. | |
| | | James Annear
Posts : 670 Join date : 2011-01-02 Age : 65 Location : hammersmith
| Subject: Thames Water ordered to pay more than £61,000 after serious sewage spill Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:28 pm | |
| Especially after they have reported first half year profits of £146million | |
| | | Ed Randall
Posts : 3326 Join date : 2010-11-19 Age : 58 Location : Twickenham
| Subject: Re: Thames Water ordered to pay more than £61,000 after serious sewage spill Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:24 pm | |
| My first thought, £61,000 is that all? | |
| | | Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Thames Water ordered to pay more than £61,000 after serious sewage spill | |
| |
| | | | Thames Water ordered to pay more than £61,000 after serious sewage spill | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |